Product
liability deals with cases involving defective
or unsafe products. Manufacturers, wholesalers,
and retailers of products can be held
liable for damages arising from the use
of defective products. Products covered
by this area of law, include food, drugs,
and real estate, as well as virtually
all consumer products. The user who is
injured and seeks damages does not need
to be the original purchaser of the product.
Nor does a person seeking damages have
to prove negligence in many cases. Product
liability frequently is a question of
strict liability: that is, if the product
is defective and that defect caused injury,
the injured user may sue for damages as
long as the product was used as it was
meant to be used and not substantially
changed from its original condition.
If the injured user was using the product
in a manner not intended by the manufacturer
or retailer, or had altered the product
so that safety features were disabled,
it may not be possible to prove that
injuries were caused by defects in the
product. The defendant may be able to
successfully claim that the injuries
were caused by the acts of the plaintiff.
Questions of negligence and breach
of warranty are also grounds for a claim
for damages under product liability.
In the case of negligence, if it can
be shown that a company was negligent
in testing its product adequately or
in supplying directions for its use,
the injured party probably has grounds
for filing suit. Similarly, a manufacturer
implies a warranty for fitness of use
and freedom from defect when an item
is sold. If the item proves to be defective,
or is unfit for the purpose intended,
an injured user can file a product liability
case. In a case of negligence, it is
important that the plaintiff be able
to show that the product was defective
when it left the control of the party
he is suing. It is not possible to hold
someone liable for a defect that occurred
after that party had control over the
product.
In product liability, there are various
areas of defects that can occur. If
a claim of strict liability is to be
pursued, the injured party will need
to show that the product was unreasonably
dangerous for its intended use, due
to a defect. There are generally three
areas in which a product can be unreasonably
dangerous:
The manufacturer or seller can fail
to warn about angers associated with
the products use. Manufacturers and
sellers are expected to give adequate
warnings about possible dangers, and
to provide clear and adequate instructions
of use. Failure to do so can cause a
useful product to become deadly. For
instance, coolants used in automobiles
are extremely toxic – failure to print
warnings of this toxicity on the product
labels could lead to an accidental poisoning
and thus to a suit for damages.
The product may have a design defect.
This means that the product is manufactured
with a defect, even if it is assembled
perfectly. An example would be a car
gasoline tank that is designed with
weak walls such that an impact can rupture
the tank and cause the car to catch
on fire, even when the tank is correctly
assembled and installed.
A manufacturing defect exists when an
otherwise safe product is rendered dangerous
because it is assembled improperly.
A car whose wheel is installed with
missing or cross-threaded bolts may
lose a wheel at high speed, injuring
or killing the driver and passengers.
If it is proved that the car was manufactured
with that defect, the manufacturer will
be liable.
In all cases of product liability, it
is essential to the success of the case
that the product be preserved and that
all paperwork showing the origin of
the product be made available. Receipts
showing purchase, any repair records,
etc., can be vital to building a successful
case. |